BastionAuth vs Keycloak
Both BastionAuth and Keycloak are self-hostable open-source authentication solutions. Here's how they compare.
TL;DR
Choose BastionAuth if you want modern developer experience, React/Next.js-first tooling, and faster time-to-value.
Choose Keycloak if you're in the Java ecosystem, need SAML today, or have existing Keycloak expertise.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | BastionAuth | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Language | Node.js/TypeScript | Java |
| Database | PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc. |
| Framework | Fastify | Quarkus |
| Deployment | ||
| Docker | β Easy | β |
| Kubernetes | π Helm | β Operator |
| Resource usage | Low (256MB) | High (1GB+) |
| Authentication | ||
| Email/password | β | β |
| OAuth/OIDC | β | β |
| SAML | π | β |
| Kerberos | β | β |
| LDAP | β | β |
| Developer Experience | ||
| React SDK | βββββ | ββ (community) |
| Next.js integration | β Native | β Manual |
| Pre-built components | β Beautiful | β Basic themes |
| Setup time | <30 min | 2+ hours |
| Admin | ||
| Dashboard | β Modern | β Functional |
| UI quality | βββββ | βββ |
| Enterprise | ||
| Multi-tenancy | β (Organizations) | β (Realms) |
| RBAC | β | β |
| Audit logs | β | β |
| Webhooks | β | β‘ (Events) |
Key Differences
1. Developer Experience
Keycloak: Java-centric. No official React SDK. Integration requires understanding OIDC flows manually.
BastionAuth: JavaScript/TypeScript native. First-class React and Next.js support. Clerk-like DX.
// BastionAuth - Simple React integration
import { BastionProvider, SignIn, useAuth } from '@bastionauth/react';
function App() {
return (
<BastionProvider publishableKey="pk_...">
<SignIn />
</BastionProvider>
);
}
// Keycloak - Manual OIDC integration
import Keycloak from 'keycloak-js';
const keycloak = new Keycloak({
url: 'https://keycloak.example.com',
realm: 'myrealm',
clientId: 'myclient',
});
keycloak.init({ onLoad: 'login-required' });2. Resource Requirements
Keycloak: JVM-based. Requires 1GB+ RAM minimum. Heavy container images.
BastionAuth: Node.js-based. Runs on 256MB RAM. Lightweight containers.
# Keycloak resources
resources:
requests:
memory: "1Gi"
cpu: "500m"
# BastionAuth resources
resources:
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "200m"3. UI Components
Keycloak: Functional but dated admin console. Login themes require FreeMarker templates.
BastionAuth: Modern glass-ui design. Pre-built React components. CSS customization.
4. Protocol Support
Keycloak: Extensive protocol support (SAML, OIDC, Kerberos, LDAP).
BastionAuth: Modern protocols (OAuth 2.0, OIDC). SAML coming soon.
5. Configuration
Keycloak: XML/JSON configuration. Steep learning curve. Many options.
BastionAuth: Environment variables. Sensible defaults. Quick setup.
Admin Dashboard Comparison
Keycloak Admin
- Functional but complex
- Many configuration options
- Steep learning curve
- FreeMarker theme customization
BastionAuth Admin
- Modern, intuitive interface
- Clean statistics dashboard
- Quick user management
- Real-time audit logs
When to Choose Keycloak
- You're in a Java/Jakarta EE ecosystem
- You need SAML SSO today
- You require LDAP/Active Directory integration
- You need Kerberos authentication
- You have existing Keycloak expertise
- You need fine-grained authorization (UMA)
When to Choose BastionAuth
- You're building with React/Next.js
- Developer experience is a priority
- You want quick setup and modern tooling
- Resource efficiency matters
- You prefer JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystem
- You want pre-built, beautiful UI components
Migration from Keycloak
# Export users from Keycloak
npx @bastionauth/cli migrate keycloak \
--url https://keycloak.example.com \
--realm myrealm \
--admin-user admin
# Import to BastionAuth
npx @bastionauth/cli migrate keycloak --importCoexistence Strategy
For gradual migration, both can coexist:
- Use BastionAuth for new frontend apps
- Keep Keycloak for legacy SAML apps
- Share database/user store via federation
- Migrate apps incrementally